GoldnThread
For construction and development teams

The building is finished. The record should be too.

GoldnThread turns practical completion from a data cliff into a clean transfer. IFC straight from the model, assets mapped to real locations, commissioning evidence attached, reconciled against the compliance schedule before anyone signs.

Book a handover demo See the completeness score
The handover problem, from your side

What you hand over follows you around.

Practical completion is where your information leaves your control and starts costing somebody money. NIST measured the cost of inadequate information transfer at USD 15.8 billion a year, with two thirds landing on the owners and operators you handed over to, years after your team demobilised.

That cost does not stay on their side of the fence. It comes back as defects disputes argued from memory, retention held longer than it should be, and a client who remembers the arguments rather than the building. Australia's Building Confidence review reached the same conclusion from the regulatory side: buildings need a durable information record that survives the transition to occupation. The developers who can already deliver one are winning on it.

What changes

Five things that make handover an asset instead of a liability.

01

The model becomes the register

IFC and JSON ingestion straight from your BIM deliverable. Assets arrive with their real attributes and locations, instead of being retyped by whoever the client hires next.

02

A completeness score before signoff

Reconciled against the compliance schedule the council issued. You see the gaps first, while your subcontractors are still on site and still answerable.

03

Commissioning evidence that survives

Test results, certificates and O&M content attach to the asset, timestamped. A defects claim two years on is answered from the record in minutes.

04

A cleaner defects liability period

The record shows what was installed, who commissioned it and how it has been maintained since. Maintenance failures stop being priced as construction defects.

05

A building that is worth more finished

It settles faster, passes due diligence without a discount for unknowns, and starts its BWoF life with a complete record.

The deliverable

Hand over a record, not a hard drive.

The owner's operations team starts from a working system on day one. Your closeout documentation includes a number, not a promise.

·IFC and JSON in, mapped assets out
·Reconciled against the compliance schedule, gap by gap
·Warranties, manuals and commissioning certificates attached at asset level
·A completeness score you can put in the PC documentation
·Continuity if you develop and hold: the record becomes your portfolio position from day one
Handover · Tower B · practical completion
IFC model ingested2,381 objects
Assets mapped644 / 644
Commissioning certificates96 / 103
Compliance schedule reconciled2 systems short
COMPLETENESS
87%close gaps before signoff
For the development business

The commercial case, plainly.

Disputes

Fewer, and shorter

The defects conversations that drag are the ones argued without evidence. A timestamped commissioning record ends most of them early, in whichever direction it points.

Closeout

Faster

Retention arguments shrink when completeness is measured rather than asserted.

Tenders

A better answer

Institutional clients are beginning to ask what the handover deliverable actually is. A live compliance ready record is a better answer than a document folder, and few competitors can give it yet.

Bring your current project.

Thirty minutes with your BIM deliverable and the draft compliance schedule. We will show you what the handover could look like.

Book a handover demo